We invite you to join 3 brilliant authors and to share with them your thoughts, suggestions and insights in a true collaborative effort .

The result of this collaboration will be officially published for Open World Forum, October 1, 2010.

YOUR INPUTS AND COMMENTS ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO ENRICH OUR COMMON FLOSS VISION!

While previous editions analyzed potential impacts of FLOSS on the future in term of technology, business and society, 2010 edition will deepen these findings on very specific aspects.

If FLOSS is like forests then maybe should FLOSS developers and companies be considered as sustainable foresters? But actually what is FLOSS forestry? Where are the schools to teach foresters to cultivate properly? And where are the international bodies defining and defending sustainable forestry? This is where the comparison between FLOSS and forest stops. And this is where the introduction of the “Commons” paradigm starts. Thanks to David Bollier, these aspects of FLOSS are covered and effects that acknowledgment of FLOSS as Commons may have, are clearly envisioned.

Another important difference between FLOSS and finite resources such as forest, water, fishery, etc., is that this type of commons can not be geographically localized: FLOSS’ nature is global. And here it is necessary to have a close look to how economics will evolve and which nations will be dominating in the coming years and in parallel, what FLOSS may or may not change to this new economical map of the world. Here, Michael Tiemann helps us to understand potential scenarios for the future, one with the biggest potential being the BRIC scenario.

Finally in the blue sky of FLOSS and as we already mentioned in previous editions, there are some huge dark clouds appearing. In his contribution, Philippe Aigrain describes why the future may look a bit cloudy and if there is some hope to see a better horizon and to have freedom in the clouds. All these ideas are thoughts in progress.

All texts are available HERE.

We hope you will appreciate David’s vision about how FLOSS and Commons are closely related. And we count on your insights and comments to enrich it.

So please feel free contribute!

In the scope of 2010 edition and its 3 main topics and after the publication of Michael Tiemann’s paper about BRIC, here is the second major contribution by Philippe Aigrain about “Freedom in the Cloud”.

We hope you will appreciate Philippe’s insights. And we are also expecting your contributions.

So please contribute!

As you may know (see previous post), 2010 edition will focus on 3 predominant topics:”Floss as Commons”, “BRIC and FLOSS” and “Freedom in the Cloud”.

In order to analyze these 3 topics, 3 major specialists have accepted to share their knowledge and insights: David Bollier, Michael Tiemann and Philippe Aigrain . They will respectively lead the effort on each topics and will expect your comments and contributions.

Today we are announcing the publication of the first major contribution by Michael Tiemann about BRIC. Now Michael is expecting your contributions.

Please contribute!

Since 2009 edition (see http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/roadmap/synthesis/), it looks like FLOSS has been through the crisis but with various side effects. While we may confirm FLOSS is there to stay, the tensions between open and free are highly sensitive (again); cloud computing is perceived as an attempt to enclose FLOSS, global agreements are in progress to reinforce intellectual property rights, net neutrality is threatened by Internet providers and legal, etc. All this making 2009-2010 period sound a bit like “the empire strikes back”.

For the 3^rd edition of 2020 FLOSS Roadmap which will be published during Open World Forum (30 September and 1 October 2010 in Paris), we suggest to study and describe these different evolutions in the perspective of what has been done the previous years:

- In 2008, we established the foundations of our roadmap (see http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/roadmap/2008-roadmap/) and listed a number of recommendations

- In 2009, we challenged our vision and updated it with new paradigm such as “FLOSS is like Forests” and we added a new powerful recommendation i.e. FLOSS to be acknowledged as knowledge commons (see http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/2020-floss-roadmap-2009-version1.pdf)

For 2010 edition , we would like to concentrate on 3 predominant topics which will be largely exposed and debated during the 2 days of Open World Forum (the following list of topics and questions is open to any suggestion or modification):

1. FLOSS as Commons: what is the way, what are the actions for having FLOSS acknowledged globally as a strategic and crucial common for knowledge society? Is FLOSS paving the way for bigger initiatives and larger variety of commons? (see also http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/2010/01/19/a-path-from-information-to-action/)

2. BRIC countries: how BRIC are using IT in their growth and how could they build larger projects joining forces on a collaborative mode? Will BRIC be the emerging leaders of useful and wealthy technological innovations? How FLOSS may help? (see also http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/roadmap/theme-7-brazil/ and http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/roadmap/appendix-floss-in-india/)

3. Openness and freedom in Cloud Computing: will FLOSS ethics survive to privatization of key open source components by cloud suppliers? Will the nature of FLOSS stay unchanged or will evolve? (see also Open Cloud Tribune http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/roadmap/head-in-the-clouds/)

The basic idea is to give food for thoughts to these debates before and after OWF’10. And maybe to take the opportunity to have longer analysis than the one you may get during 1 hour panels or 20′ speeches. Of course on each topics, we are expecting contradictory debates enabling smart analysis of the situation and we are also expecting recommendations from experts in order for the initial 2020 FLOSS roadmap to become a reality.

We would really appreciate if you could devote a part of your time or at least a part of your thoughts to this collaborative effort. Our will is to be able to enrich altogether the average common knowledge about FLOSS not only as pieces of technology or competitive tactics but also as a mean to create sustainable wealth and to establish a fair and open knowledge society (one of the primary goal of Open World Forum is to create a space where to establish a common understanding of FLOSS and its related topics in order to build sustainable ecosystems on top of it).

If you are interested to participate to this effort for 2010 edition, please let us know by any mean you would judge appropriate. Feel free to forward this message to any contact who might be interested. Feel free also to contact me for additional details.

Look forward to collaborating with you

JPL.

Note for those who are not familiar with this collaborative effort.

The way we work is quite “classic”:

The main rules are openness and consensus: 2020 FLOSS Roadmap is open to any contributor as far as his/her contributions are accepted by the others. Any contributor can propose and lead a specific theme.

Around 40 contributors have participated so far to 2008 and 2009 editions (see http://www.2020flossroadmap.org/about/contributors/).

All contributors are copyright holders.

All documents are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license.

2020Flossroadmap.org site is used to publish all documents, minutes in order to be able to collect comments and criticism (thanks to co-ment, an AGPL web service http://www.co-ment.org/)

A dedicated mailing is also available which relays all changes of the web site, you can subscribe to it using the form in the top right corner of the home page of the 2020Flossroadmap.org website.

On twitter and identi.ca, the ash tag #20frm is used to refer any info relating to topics treated in our documents. This may be highly useful to feed our publication with valuable references and articles.

We organize frequent conference calls and meetings in order to publish a common document based on our findings in October 2010. The announcement of these calls or meetings are done via the web site .

Finally a draft edition will be proposed for final comment mid-September in order to be able to edit it and publish 1 October 2010.

For more information about 2020 FLOSS Roadmap, see 2020flossroadmap.org

Organised by European Commission (EC), this event offered the opportunity for EC to expose the theme (see also agenda of the meeting) and to evaluate interest in the domain from European Academia and Industry. The first release of the report elaborated by an expert group,  “The Future of Cloud Computing” was presented here (this report is available on  http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/docs/cloud-report-final.pdf and is open to comments).

In this  workshop, the message “Cloud is the next big thing” was repeated clearly by all participants. Hope Europeans will understand it to re-energize European IT Industry.

Read more (in French)

While Open World Forum 2010 has been officially launched during last Steering Committee and Forum Committee’s meetings earlier in January, let’s have a look at what are the objectives of the 3rd edition of 2020 FLOSS Roadmap as it will be published end of September.

Full text of  2010 working document is freely available here.

Until now, 2020 FLOSS Roadmap has been conceived and perceived as a highly valuable source of information about FLOSS.  But it has been also highlighted that it was lacking of tangible proposals. While keeping this informative quality, we consider that it is time for more concrete results in order to achieve our initial goal which was to produce an influential instrument for decision makers from public agencies to private companies.

The first version has defined the framework of our work, the second edition has validated the accuracy of this framework – 94 recommendations published for this 1^st version. But more than this validation, the 2nd version of 2020 FLOSS Roadmap in its synthesis and recommendation, has also focused on 2 important points:

• FLOSS is like forests
• Acknowledge the intrinsic value of FLOSS infrastructure for essential applications as a public knowledge asset (or ‘as knowledge commons’), and consider new means to ensure its sustainable development

These points have opened new types of questions:

If FLOSS is like forests, is there a “forestry” for FLOSS? Is acknowledgment of FLOSS as commons a necessity?

Then if we answer positively to these questions, it opens even more other questions such as:

What are precisely the issues?
Would it not be necessary to go from information / recommendation – what has been done on the 2 last years – to more concrete actions? Which actions could be taken? And could these actions be taken in commons?
Would these issues necessitate to establish a specific organization(s)? Or could a network of loosely coupled organizations succeed?

We also expect other new and challenging questions  from contributors to enrich the debates.

Answers to all these questions are expected to make of 2010 edition a “call for action” – vs. purely prospective analysis. Full text of  2010 working document is freely available here.

2010 edition will also follow up on what has been already established – as we did previous years (new themes from Systematic, Cap Digital and other contributors, plus analysis about Open Cloud, etc.)

Last but not least, if you are interested in challenging 2020 FLOSS Roadmap with uncovered issues or questions, you are welcome. Or if you would like to propose paper on new theme which you judge important for the future of FLOSS, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Full text of  2010 working document is freely available here.

This new column is a collection of all links gathered since last edition of the road map thanks to all tweets, blogs and news published during this period. All these links are related to the key topics of our study:

• Commons
• Digital Economy, Copyrights, etc.
• Business Ecosystems
• Education, employment and careers
• Financial System
• Innovation
• IT, Governance
• Open Cloud, SaaS, Social Network, Micro Blogging, etc.
• Open World
• Open Science
• Predictions, Prospectives
• Public policies, Internet, Open Standards, Open Data

This column will be updated on a regular basis in order to identify the trends and the flows to be analysed in our 2010 edition. Please feel free to contact us for other links which you might consider as relevant.

We hope this will greatly enhance our results, and moreover that you will enjoy the diversity of  collected articles.

We hope to see you somewhere on our road map for 2010,  and wish you all the best for this coming year.

On the behalf of 2020 Floss Roadmap contributors, best wishes for the new year

When we started discussing about next version of 2020 Floss Roadmap, we agreed to insist on the importance of FLOSS to be acknowledged as a commons. And this brought to the table three questions: “why FLOSS should be considered as a commons?”, “Who has to acknowledged FLOSS as a commons?” and “How to make this commons sustainable?”. Analyzing the specificity of a commons and how it relates to FLOSS, Cedric Thomas[1] pointed us to Alain Lipietz [2]‘s remarkable paper titled “Questions about Commons”. In this paper Lipietz gives a lot of insightful reflections about the nature of commons and especially exposes the etymology of the word commons: it finds its origin from the Norman word “commun”(still in use in French) which derives from Latin “munus”, which means both “gift” and “duty.” Sharing this information with David Bollier [3], he was so intrigued that we decided to translate this article into English. All together we highly recommend you to read this edifying text — English version / French version.

In “Questions about Commons “, Lipietz explains that “munus”... means both gift and duty. To receive a gift — a munus — is to be obliged to respond with a counter-gift.” This dual meaning reflects properly the intrinsic nature of FLOSS. Let’s have a look to GNU Linux with its large “com mun ity” [4] of contributors and its wide adoption: Linus Torvalds as “ benevolent dictator”, is in charge of regulating the commons i.e. GNU Linux Kernel. With “mun ificence”, he shares his source code freely, works at integrating contributions of other developers and finally he offers to anyone, free access and usage to a highly complex and valuable piece of technology. These days, Torvalds also gets a “re num eration” for his activities and has the ability to make a living out of this commons[5]. This dual meaning of “munus” explains also the mechanism by which FLOSS has the capability to transform software development into a virtuous circle, and at the end of the day, to deliver better and larger software for everyone. Reciprocity is at the heart of commons and FLOSS: developers give to you access and usage to software, and in return, you may (or may not) contribute under different forms such as adding code, providing bug reports or writing documentation. These basic principles are clearly exposed by Lipietz when he writes that “the commons are not [only] things, but social relations [to produce or create things]. “ And so is FLOSS: it is not yet another artifact but a process to develop software in a collaborative way, and this process can describe itself as a social relationship. Here we have our answer to our first question: actually Floss should be considered as a commons because both are of the same nature.

Lipietz provides also guidance to the two other issues i.e. acknowledgment and sustainability of FLOSS. Describing the historical relations which have always articulated the commons with political power and market, he describes what should be the rules of the game and who are the players.

Concerning political power, Lipietz develops the ideas of regulation of commons by the state and he adds that the state has a role to play in the redistribution of wealth generated by the commons. This implies also the responsibility of the state “for maintaining a local commons of global interest.” He precises that when “the state is the gatekeeper and custodian,” it “ is obliged to obtain the prior informed consent of the local community, if granted access, while sharing the profits with this community. “ Here we have good hope that under the influence of some pioneers such as Brazil or Canada, and in regards to recent positive signs in the Netherlands [6], in the UK [7] and in the USA [8], this key notion of reciprocity governing FLOSS, its usage and its sustainability, is starting to be understood and integrated by governments — the positions of powerful institutions such as DOD [9] or NATO [10] concerning FLOSS exemplifies this trend. May we expect that nations, European Union, United Nations, Unesco, etc. would officially acknowledge FLOSS as commons before 2020? Let’s work it out!

On the market side, if we consider that the market can serve the commons positively, then we can admit that this service should also be compensated by a fair “re mun eration.” The recent communication of Red Hat’s CEO to Obama’s administration about creation of jobs [11], is an example of good understanding on how FLOSS can benefit at the same time to private business and public good while preserving the integrity of commons. Actually we need companies to keep on contributing to commons, to get a remuneration and to facilitate the creation of healthy business ecosystems. But we also need to prevent this commons from any form of privatization. How is this feasible?

In fact the answer to this question belongs to multiple stakeholders i.e. to vibrant and various Floss communities, to renown activists such as R. Stallman or L. Lessig, to historical FLOSS “establishment” such as Free Software Foundation, Apache Foundation, Software Freedom Law Center,… and to members of civil society who are cautious for their freedom as citizens of a digital world, and join forces in organizations such as Electronic Frontier Foundation, Knowledge Ecology International, Quadrature du Net, April, … All of them are essential to assure that reciprocity is maintained in a sustainable manner, to make sure that the articulation of commons with political power and market is balanced at its best, and to sound the alarm when there is a risk of enclosure of the commons. All these individuals and organizations should be considered as key levers for making 2020 FLOSS Roadmap’s recommendation a reality i.e. “Acknowledge the intrinsic value of FLOSS infrastructure for essential applications as a public knowledge asset (or as ‘knowledge commons’), and consider new means to ensure its sustainable development.” So let’s count on them, support them and work with them.

Finally the key root of the word “Communication” being also “munus” (com mun icare i.e. to impart, share, or make common), we would like to thank Alain Lipietz for his insights which are nurturing our thoughts and are paving the way of our future communication.

Jean-Pierre Laisné,

2020 FLOSS Roadmap Team

Notes & References

1. Cedric Thomas is the CEO of the OW2 Consortium.  See Cedric Thomas’ presentation “Open Source and its Communities” – slides 14-32

2. Alain Liptiez is a French engineer, economist and politician, and a member of the French Green Party.

3. David Bollier is a journalist, activist, and public policy analyst as well as Editor of Onthecommons.org and co-founder of Public Knowledge. A Senior Fellow at the Norman Lear Center, Bollier is the author of numerous highly praised books, including Brand Name Bullies and Silent Theft. He lives in Amherst, MA. You can find his blog about Lipietz’ speech here.

4. About etymology of community, see also P2PFoundation

5. Linus Torvalds works under Linux Foundation ‘s auspices. Other examples about
Torvalds: “Red Hat and VA Linux, both leading developers of Linux-based software, presented Torvalds with stock options in gratitude for his creation. In 1999, both companies went public and Torvalds’ net worth shot up to roughly $20 million.”. More or less alike other key contributors to Linux kernel have also been hired by companies such as Red Hat, IBM, Novell, etc. (see “Linux Foundation Updates Study on Linux Development Statistics: Who Writes Linux and Who Supports It”)

6. “NL: Government to increase open source in key IT projects”

7. “Government-wide IT strategy to be launched in December”. See also “The great British open-source arms race “

8. “Five Technologies to See Huge Growth in US Gov’t, Group Says“. See also “Open sourcers aim selves at US gov“ 

9. USA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (CIO): CLARIFYING GUIDANCE REGARDING OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE (OSS)

10. NATO: STRATEGY FOR THE USE OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE IN NATO SYSTEMS (Doc: AC/322-D(2009)0015 (INV)

11. “Red Hat’s CEO on Obama jobs summit – ‘Creating jobs the open source way‘”

Personal message

First of all and as some of you may have noticed, I broke my neck. And this accident prevented me to fully enjoy Open World Forum 2010, the presence of so many high level speakers and at last but not least to meet with some 2020 Floss Roadmap contributors (what a shame). I have just been able to participate for my presentation of 2^nd edition of the Floss Road Map for the closing session thanks to some strong medicine: My apologies those who attended, I was pitiful

Twitter

But the good thing about this accident is that I discovered the Twitter power and was able to follow most of what happened during those 2 days and how enthusiastic attendees were about the program we had been preparing for months now. Since that day, I must admit I am addicted to this simplistic communication tool (BTW here is my twitter address). Therefore you will find a new right column on 2020FlossRoadmap.org with all “tweets” which I identified as being linked to the roadmap. #20FRM is the tag used to populate this column: Please feel free to use it when you find subject related to our works, it will be automatically listed on 2020FlossRoadmap.org.

Communication around 2020 Floss Roadmap

Concerning the communication around 2020 Floss Roadmap, we tried to make a better usage of social networks (Facebook, Linkedin, …) and bloggs than we did for the 1st edition (see the results here). The traffic on 2020flossroadmap.org significantly but momentarily raised: this type of communication can only be effective if done on a regular basis (any suggestion or help in this area is welcome).

Nevertheless the feedbacks that we received have been very encouraging. Particularly about the 2 principal messages of 2009 edition i.e. “Floss is like forests” and “Floss to be acknowledged as knowledge commons”. Actually it looks like our findings are in sync with history or at least “l’air du temps”: the clearest evidence being the Nobel in economic science which was awarded to Elinor Ostrom. Mrs Ostrom’s work focuses on the commons, such as how pools of users manage natural resources (knowledge being also considered as a natural resource) as common property. This “coincidence” has been highlighted by Glynn Moody’s article “Back to the Future: 2020 Roadmap Updated” . Matthew Aslett in his article “FOSS: War is over (if you want it)” also insisted on the importance of FLOSS to be acknowledged as a public knowledge asset. This gives a good perspective about where we should put our efforts for 2010 version of our Roadmap.

Open World Forum 2009: Great success, let’s do it again!

During Open World Forum‘s debriefing and while I agreed with all contributors that OWF 2009 has been a great success, I suggested that for next year we should insist on the fact that FLOSS enables the alliance of technology and solidarity i.e. Floss as a mean to innovate (from technological to business aspects) but also as a social factor. I hope this orientation will be positively considered in the coming discussions about 2010 agenda.

Paris Accord

In the same period of time I have been fortunate to be invited at the 2^nd round of Paris Accord thanks to Philippe Aigrain’s introduction. Paris Accord is a meeting organised by Transtlantic Consumer Dialogue and its focus is on identifying areas where consumers and creative and inventive communities can work closer together. Several of the clusters presented specific ideas about how the Paris Accord text might be implemented in concrete ways, including specific proposals for financing investments in knowledge as a public good.. During the Software session and its preparation, I had the opportunity to exchange with highly active and international FLOSS personalities about the recommendations we developed in the road map (see the agenda here). My inputs where mainly focused on FLOSS to be acknowledged as public goods and on which incentives and funding mechanisms have to be set up for these public goods to be sustainable. The resulting text upon which we agreed is available here.

One highly interesting finding out of these 2 days is that all activities traditionally managed under copyright control are facing the same type of issues when it comes to free/open access facilitated by technologies. As already mentioned in 2009 version when we discussed about data and contents, we need to take a close look at what is happening in other artistic domains such as music or films: I see a lot of issues echoed from one group to another. When Peter Jenner (respect for the producer of The Clash) says that “Recording industry goes from products to services”, does not that sound familiar? Or when he declares that “Piracy appears when appropriate offer does not exist”, is not that the value proposal of FLOSS? And when Hank Shocklee (big up for Public Enemy’s co-founder) argues that “In music today, consumers are also producers i.e. prosumers”, isn’t this related also to the virtuous circle of FLOSS. Thanks again to James Love and Malini Aisola from Knowledge Ecology International for setting up such a brilliant event.

Free Culture Forum and David Bollier

At the end of October, beginning of November, generous twitterers offered to me the possibility to follow Free Culture Forum in Barcelona. While you may find many interesting videos of the debates on the site http://fcforum.net/ (e.g. J. Rifkin about Distributed Capitalism), I would recommend you to have a close look to the charter resulting of these 3 days of discussions . This document is dealing with broader subject i.e. Culture but there are some common and interesting grounds with 2020 Floss Roadmap and OWF such as open standards, education, net neutrality, sustainability and finally once again commons. On this last topic, I was particularly intrigued by one message : “Governments should support the commons as it supports the market“. This quote excerpted from David Bollier‘ speech about Digital Republic (complete text here) was resuming simply and efficiently one of the thoughts which was in the air of all discussions we’ve been through since months now (By the way, I suspect most of the introduction of FCF charter to be written by Mr Bollier). David Bollier being an experienced commoner (he is a co-founder of Public Knowledge; editor of  OntheCommons.org and an activist and writer about the commons – see my  review of his last book “Viral Spiral”), I decided to contact him and David gently replied. We agreed to exchange about how to put into practice some of the points he exposed in Barcelona and some ideas we have in the roadmap.

Next steps

Thanks to the material that we collect daily, the fruitful contacts we establish around our works and the circumstances which look quite favourable (“l’air du temps”), it might be interesting to start discussing about 3rd version of 2020 Floss Roadmap, its directions and objectives. I will work on this in the coming days and expect to give some news in a week or two. This will give me time to fully recover (my neck is still not very flexible) and by the way to clarify some ideas.

Best wishes,

Jean-Pierre Laisné.